| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i5-2400


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i5-2400 gets 84.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 7.5 times faster than the i5-2400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
12 /24
4/4
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
25.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
84.36k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
2.72k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
7.6k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
3.98k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
4.47k (x1.13)
TOTAL
21.13k
18.78k (x0.89)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
10.37k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
28.84k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
15.08k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
4.67k (x0.58)
TOTAL
419.12k
58.95k (x0.14)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
9.16k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
8.2k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
3.95k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
4.17k (x1.23)
TOTAL
27.92k
25.49k (x0.91)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
34.74k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
31.07k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
14.86k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
3.69k (x0.35)
TOTAL
633.14k
84.36k (x0.13)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
327 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
888 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i5-2400
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
2695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
2411 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
1163 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
1228 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
7497 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4