Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 6.8 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 6.8 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
a0652
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
12 /24
4/8
TDP
130 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
246.07k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
15.65k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
23.13k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
5.66k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
11.43k (x3.36)
TOTAL
27.92k
55.87k (x2)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
26.77k (x0.11)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
43.81k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
10.17k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
11.91k (x1.12)
TOTAL
633.14k
92.66k (x0.15)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
595 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
974 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
2059 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
3477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
2540 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
12415 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4