| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Ryzen 9 7950X


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 7950X is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the 7950X gets 1330.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.1 times faster than the E5-2697 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
a60f12
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Raphael
Architecture
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM5
Cores/Threads
12 /24
16/32
TDP
130 W
170 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
131072 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
121.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
1597.79k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
6.05k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
23.41k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
16.49k (x3.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
34.35k (x8.71)
TOTAL
21.13k
80.3k (x3.8)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
128.82k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
465.79k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
289.43k (x2.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
75.23k (x9.42)
TOTAL
419.12k
959.27k (x2.29)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
26.86k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
30.05k (x3.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
16.15k (x4.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
31.74k (x9.32)
TOTAL
27.92k
104.8k (x3.75)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
430.6k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
545.91k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
289.57k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
64.33k (x6.04)
TOTAL
633.14k
1330.41k (x2.1)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
2533 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
3211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
1703 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
378 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
7826 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
4712 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5272 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
2834 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
18386 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4