Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Ryzen 7 5800H
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the 5800H gets 221.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.9 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the 5800H gets 221.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.9 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
a50f00
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
12 /24
8/16
TDP
130 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2013
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
426.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
4.31k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
17.51k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
10.53k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
23.57k (x5.98)
TOTAL
21.13k
55.92k (x2.65)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
24.18k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
117.98k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
70.96k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
8.08k (x1.01)
TOTAL
419.12k
221.19k (x0.53)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
563 points/W
537 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1776 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
1577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
180 points/W
TOTAL
3224 points/W
4915 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
982 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2726 points/GHz
3979 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/GHz
2393 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1126 points/GHz
5357 points/GHz
TOTAL
6036 points/GHz
12709 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4