Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Ryzen 5 2600
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the 2600 gets 177.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 2.4 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the 2600 gets 177.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 2.4 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
800f82
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
12 /24
6/12
TDP
130 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
291.53k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
3.41k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
15.96k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
4.69k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
17.42k (x4.42)
TOTAL
21.13k
41.47k (x1.96)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
20.88k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
110.37k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
39.25k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
6.66k (x0.83)
TOTAL
419.12k
177.16k (x0.42)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
563 points/W
321 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1776 points/W
1698 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
604 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
3224 points/W
2726 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
982 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2726 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/GHz
1202 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1126 points/GHz
4466 points/GHz
TOTAL
6036 points/GHz
10633 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4