| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 7.7 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
100fa0
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
12 /24
6/6
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2013
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
1.98k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
4.57k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
2.57k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
3.51k (x0.89)
TOTAL
21.13k
12.64k (x0.6)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
11.86k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
27.4k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
15.39k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
3.46k (x0.43)
TOTAL
419.12k
58.11k (x0.14)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
5.17k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
5.33k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
2.76k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
3.51k (x0.97)
TOTAL
27.91k
16.77k (x0.6)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
29.82k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
30.79k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
15.88k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
3.69k (x0.34)
TOTAL
617.84k
80.19k (x0.13)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1944 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1836 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
888 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
4753 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3041 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2722 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
7973 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4