Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 760K is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 12.7 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 12.7 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
610f31
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Richland
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
12 /24
4/4
TDP
130 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
kB
Date
September 2013
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
9.53k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
8.14k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
3.45k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.48k (x1.02)
TOTAL
27.92k
24.6k (x0.88)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
18.2k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
19.33k (x0.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
8.42k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
3.86k (x0.36)
TOTAL
633.14k
49.8k (x0.08)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4