Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i9-13900K
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1501.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 2.4 times faster than the E5-2697 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1501.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 2.4 times faster than the E5-2697 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
b0671
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12 /24
24/32
TDP
130 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
36864 kB
Date
September 2013
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
1763.08k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
9.77k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
24.52k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
17.17k (x4.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
21.37k (x5.42)
TOTAL
21.13k
72.83k (x3.45)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
145.21k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
444.95k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
318.3k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
27.2k (x3.4)
TOTAL
419.12k
935.66k (x2.23)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
31.93k (x3)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
31.54k (x3.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
18.8k (x4.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
20.82k (x5.76)
TOTAL
27.91k
103.09k (x3.69)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
522.07k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
584.17k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
344.38k (x2.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
25.36k (x2.31)
TOTAL
617.84k
1475.97k (x2.39)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
31.8k (x3.02)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
32.83k (x3.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
18.37k (x4.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
21.13k (x6.21)
TOTAL
27.92k
104.13k (x3.73)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
532.97k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
596.78k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
342.96k (x3.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
28.6k (x2.68)
TOTAL
633.14k
1501.31k (x2.37)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
4774 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
2744 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
229 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
12011 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
5483 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5660 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
3166 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
3644 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
17953 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4