| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i7-13700HX


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 836.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2697 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
b06f2
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
12 /24
16/24
TDP
130 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
1070.39k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
27.23k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
27.1k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
15.65k (x3.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
15.52k (x4.56)
TOTAL
27.92k
85.5k (x3.06)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
277.49k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
360.68k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
173.57k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
25.19k (x2.36)
TOTAL
633.14k
836.93k (x1.32)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
5045 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
6558 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
3156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
458 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
15217 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
5446 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5420 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
3130 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
3104 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
17101 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4