| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i7-1165G7


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 633.1 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 190.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 3.3 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
806c1
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
12 /24
4/8
TDP
130 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2013
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
4.26k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
19.54k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
10.95k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
11.08k (x2.81)
TOTAL
21.13k
45.84k (x2.17)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
15.69k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
68.3k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
33.66k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
12.16k (x1.52)
TOTAL
419.12k
129.81k (x0.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
14.48k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
24.18k (x2.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
11.95k (x2.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
11.01k (x3.05)
TOTAL
27.91k
61.62k (x2.21)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
50.98k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
80.7k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
36.61k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
12.02k (x1.1)
TOTAL
617.84k
180.32k (x0.29)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
10.53k
16.27k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
25.74k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4k
11.5k (x2.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
10.82k (x3.18)
TOTAL
27.92k
64.32k (x2.3)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
247.05k
54k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
264.43k
88.76k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.01k
35.23k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.66k
12.14k (x1.14)
TOTAL
633.14k
190.12k (x0.3)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1900 points/W
1928 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2034 points/W
3170 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
854 points/W
1258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
434 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
6790 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3007 points/GHz
3462 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5476 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/GHz
2447 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
973 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
TOTAL
7976 points/GHz
13686 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4