| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i5-11400T


Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 6.2 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
a0671
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12 /24
6/12
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2013
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
67.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.44k
3.51k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
9.54k
14.2k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
7.63k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.94k
6.06k (x1.54)
TOTAL
21.13k
31.39k (x1.49)

Multithread

E5-2697 v2

i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
73.17k
7.4k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
230.83k
31.37k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
107.14k
18.11k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.99k
10.23k (x1.28)
TOTAL
419.12k
67.1k (x0.16)

Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
563 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1776 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
3224 points/W
1917 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
982 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2726 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1126 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
6036 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4