| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i7-6900K


Description
The E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 2.4 times faster than the i7-6900K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
406f1
Core
Haswell-EP
Broadwell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
135 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
40.71k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
1016.36k points
427.51k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2690 v3
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.96k
23.11k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
11.74k
17.84k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.34k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.47k (x1.02)
TOTAL
40.71k
49.76k (x1.22)

Multithread

E5-2690 v3

i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
531.68k
184.19k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
342.28k
181.2k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.22k
47.44k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.19k
14.69k (x1.6)
TOTAL
1016.36k
427.51k (x0.42)

Performance/W
E5-2690 v3
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3938 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2535 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
7529 points/W
3054 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2690 v3
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5988 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3356 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1318 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
971 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
11632 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4