| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i5-8300H


Description
The E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 5.6 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
906ea
Core
Haswell-EP
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
135 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
40.71k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
1016.36k points
182.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2690 v3
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.96k
23.6k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
11.74k
21.72k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.61k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
6.8k (x2)
TOTAL
40.71k
56.72k (x1.39)

Multithread

E5-2690 v3

i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
531.68k
79.12k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
342.28k
81.27k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.22k
17.46k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.19k
4.62k (x0.5)
TOTAL
1016.36k
182.47k (x0.18)

Performance/W
E5-2690 v3
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3938 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2535 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
7529 points/W
4055 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2690 v3
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5988 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3356 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1318 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
971 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
11632 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4