Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i3-10100
Description
The E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 6.3 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 6.3 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0653
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.71k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
1016.36k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2690 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.96k
22.74k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
11.74k
20.31k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.71k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
7.65k (x2.25)
TOTAL
40.71k
55.41k (x1.36)
Multithread
E5-2690 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
531.68k
71.95k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
342.28k
67.7k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.22k
16.43k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.19k
6.25k (x0.68)
TOTAL
1016.36k
162.33k (x0.16)
Performance/W
E5-2690 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
3938 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2535 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
7529 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
5988 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3356 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1318 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
971 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
11632 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4