| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i7-13700K


Description
The E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-13700K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i7-13700K gets 1234.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700K is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
b0671
Core
Haswell-EP
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
16/24
TDP
135 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x2048+2x4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2014
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
40.71k points
121.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
1016.36k points
1234.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2690 v3
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.96k
53.98k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
11.74k
31.5k (x2.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
16.52k (x3.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
19.78k (x5.82)
TOTAL
40.71k
121.79k (x2.99)

Multithread

E5-2690 v3

i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
531.68k
574.06k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
342.28k
435.61k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.22k
211.31k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.19k
13.69k (x1.49)
TOTAL
1016.36k
1234.67k (x1.21)

Performance/W
E5-2690 v3
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3938 points/W
4592 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2535 points/W
3485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
1690 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
7529 points/W
9877 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2690 v3
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
5988 points/GHz
9997 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3356 points/GHz
5834 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1318 points/GHz
3059 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
971 points/GHz
3664 points/GHz
TOTAL
11632 points/GHz
22553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4