| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i5-13600K


Description
The E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-13600K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i5-13600K gets 1023.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13600K is 1 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
b0671
Core
Haswell-EP
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
14/20
TDP
135 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2014
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
40.71k points
115.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
1016.36k points
1023.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2690 v3
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.96k
54.36k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
11.74k
29.93k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
15.39k (x3.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
15.52k (x4.57)
TOTAL
40.71k
115.19k (x2.83)

Multithread

E5-2690 v3

i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
531.68k
457.21k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
342.28k
360.82k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.22k
172.64k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.19k
32.91k (x3.58)
TOTAL
1016.36k
1023.59k (x1.01)

Performance/W
E5-2690 v3
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3938 points/W
3658 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2535 points/W
2887 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
1381 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
7529 points/W
8189 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2690 v3
i5-13600K
Test#1 (Integers)
5988 points/GHz
10658 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3356 points/GHz
5869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1318 points/GHz
3018 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
971 points/GHz
3042 points/GHz
TOTAL
11632 points/GHz
22587 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4