Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i9-12900K
Description
The E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i9-12900K is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i9-12900K gets 1131.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900K is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i9-12900K gets 1131.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900K is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
90672
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
16/24
TDP
135 W
241 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2014
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
40.71k points
109.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
1016.36k points
1131.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2690 v3
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.96k
47.92k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
11.74k
30.1k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
15.65k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
15.38k (x4.53)
TOTAL
40.71k
109.05k (x2.68)
Multithread
E5-2690 v3
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
531.68k
502.11k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
342.28k
414.67k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.22k
192.52k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.19k
22.3k (x2.43)
TOTAL
1016.36k
1131.59k (x1.11)
Performance/W
E5-2690 v3
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3938 points/W
2083 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2535 points/W
1721 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
799 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
7529 points/W
4695 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 v3
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5988 points/GHz
9216 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3356 points/GHz
5789 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1318 points/GHz
3009 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
971 points/GHz
2957 points/GHz
TOTAL
11632 points/GHz
20971 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4