Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i5-11400F
Description
The E5-2690 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 2.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 v3 gets a score of 1016.4 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 v3 is 2.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0671
Core
Haswell-EP
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
40.71k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
1016.36k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2690 v3
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
20.96k
31.66k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
11.74k
26.21k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
11.96k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
18.5k (x5.45)
TOTAL
40.71k
88.34k (x2.17)
Multithread
E5-2690 v3
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
531.68k
210.36k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
342.28k
203.84k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
133.22k
72.05k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.19k
9.4k (x1.02)
TOTAL
1016.36k
495.65k (x0.49)
Performance/W
E5-2690 v3
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3938 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2535 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
7529 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 v3
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5988 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3356 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1318 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
971 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
11632 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4