Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i7-10870H
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i7-10870H gets 375.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i7-10870H gets 375.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
a0652
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8 /16
8/16
TDP
135 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2012
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
487.05k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
16.14k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
24.74k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
5.98k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
12.7k (x3.82)
TOTAL
23.28k
59.55k (x2.56)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
117.03k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
199.88k (x3.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
50.64k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
8.23k (x2.12)
TOTAL
185.26k
375.77k (x2.03)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
2601 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
4442 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
1125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
183 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
8351 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3227 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
4947 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1197 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
2539 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
11910 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4