Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i3-7130U
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i3-7130U gets 68.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 2.7 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i3-7130U gets 68.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 2.7 times faster than the i3-7130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
806e9
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8 /16
2/4
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2012
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
42k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
90.89k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
9.99k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
15.18k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
3.67k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
4.09k (x1.23)
TOTAL
23.28k
32.94k (x1.41)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
20.69k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
34.96k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
8.75k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.73k (x0.96)
TOTAL
185.26k
68.13k (x0.37)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
1379 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
2331 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
4542 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3701 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
5623 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
1359 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
12200 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4