Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Ryzen 5 5500
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 5500 is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the 5500 gets 324 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1.7 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the 5500 gets 324 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1.7 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
a50f00
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
AM4
Cores/Threads
8 /16
6/12
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2012
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
80.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
373.05k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
15.32k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
22.98k (x3.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
9.3k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
21.19k (x6.38)
TOTAL
23.28k
68.8k (x2.96)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
80.25k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
163.59k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
72.83k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
7.34k (x1.89)
TOTAL
185.26k
324.01k (x1.75)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
2517 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
1120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
4985 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
3648 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
5472 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
2214 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
5046 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
16381 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4