Xeon E5-2690 0 vs FX 9590
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.3 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.3 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
600f20
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
8 /16
8/8
TDP
135 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2012
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
11.51k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
9.57k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
4.19k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
7.14k (x2.15)
TOTAL
23.28k
32.41k (x1.39)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
55.13k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
51.69k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
27.02k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.81k (x0.98)
TOTAL
185.26k
137.65k (x0.74)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4