Xeon E5-2690 0 vs Core i5-12500H
Description
The E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-12500H gets 201.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2690 0 gets a score of 185.3 k points while the i5-12500H gets 201.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206d7
906a3
Core
Sandy Bridge-EP
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8 /16
12/16
TDP
135 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2012
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
23.28k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
185.26k points
225.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2690 0
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
21.11k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
7.35k
19.61k (x2.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
9.53k (x2.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
7.72k (x2.32)
TOTAL
23.28k
57.97k (x2.49)
Multithread
E5-2690 0
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
78.51k
61.44k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
66.46k
93.66k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
40.09k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
6.01k (x1.55)
TOTAL
185.26k
201.2k (x1.09)
Performance/W
E5-2690 0
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
582 points/W
1365 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
270 points/W
891 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
134 points/W
TOTAL
1372 points/W
4471 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2690 0
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
2305 points/GHz
4692 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1933 points/GHz
4357 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
874 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
6127 points/GHz
12883 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4