Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i7-7820HQ
Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 5.9 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 5.9 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
906e9
Core
Broadwell-EP
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
14/28
4/8
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2016
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
55.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
196.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
23.23k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
20.13k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.57k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
7.92k (x3.09)
TOTAL
41.35k
55.85k (x1.35)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
85.54k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
87.07k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
20.37k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
3.57k (x0.17)
TOTAL
1162.63k
196.55k (x0.17)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
1935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
4368 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
5956 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1172 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
14321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4