Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i7-4600U
Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-4600U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i7-4600U gets 64.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 18 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i7-4600U gets 64.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 18 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
40651
Core
Broadwell-EP
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
14/28
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2016
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
28.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
64.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
14.37k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
8.31k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
3.35k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
2.96k (x1.15)
TOTAL
41.35k
28.98k (x0.7)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
31.32k (x0.06)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
20.17k (x0.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
8.02k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
5.03k (x0.24)
TOTAL
1162.63k
64.55k (x0.06)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
535 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
4303 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
4353 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
896 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
8781 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4