| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i5-14600K


Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-14600K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i5-14600K gets 1066.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-14600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
b0671
Core
Broadwell-EP
Raptor Lake-R
Architecture
Broadwell
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
5.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/28
14/20
TDP
120 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
6x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
24576 kB
Date
March 2016
October 2023
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
114.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
1066.57k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i5-14600K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
51.59k (x2.9)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
30.19k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
15.42k (x3.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
17.58k (x6.86)
TOTAL
41.35k
114.78k (x2.78)

Multithread

E5-2680 v4

i5-14600K
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
473.05k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
375.3k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
189.55k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
28.68k (x1.38)
TOTAL
1162.63k
1066.57k (x0.92)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i5-14600K
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
3784 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
3002 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
1516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
229 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
8533 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i5-14600K
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
9734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
5697 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
2909 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
3317 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
21657 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4