| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i3-8145U


Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 15.5 times faster than the i3-8145U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
806eb
Core
Broadwell-EP
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
14/28
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2016
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
34.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
75.13k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
17.78k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
12.8k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
2.61k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
1.3k (x0.51)
TOTAL
41.35k
34.48k (x0.83)

Multithread

E5-2680 v4

i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
28.06k (x0.06)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
34.83k (x0.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
9.69k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
2.55k (x0.12)
TOTAL
1162.63k
75.13k (x0.06)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
2322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
5008 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
4558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
3281 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
669 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
332 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
8840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4