| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.6 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
806d0
Core
Broadwell-EP
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
14/28
8/16
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
24576 kB
Date
March 2016
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
709.85k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
30.84k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
26.38k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
12.66k (x2.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
11.74k (x4.58)
TOTAL
41.35k
81.62k (x1.97)

Multithread

E5-2680 v4

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
294.86k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
280.92k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
113.9k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
20.16k (x0.97)
TOTAL
1162.63k
709.85k (x0.61)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4