Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 7945HX is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2680 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7945HX is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2680 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
a60f12
Core
Broadwell-EP
Dragon Range
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
14/28
16/32
TDP
120 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
65536 kB
Date
March 2016
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
1313.94k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
37.43k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
30.7k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
15.16k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
29.78k (x11.62)
TOTAL
41.35k
113.07k (x2.73)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
556.68k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
482.32k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
225.46k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
49.48k (x2.38)
TOTAL
1162.63k
1313.94k (x1.13)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
23890 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4