Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Ryzen 7 7700X
Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 7700X is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the 7700X gets 752.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.5 times faster than the 7700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the 7700X gets 752.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.5 times faster than the 7700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
a60f12
Core
Broadwell-EP
Raphael
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM5
Cores/Threads
14/28
8/16
TDP
120 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2016
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
115.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
752.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
38.8k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
30.25k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
15.58k (x3.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
30.59k (x11.94)
TOTAL
41.35k
115.23k (x2.79)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
307.13k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
261.07k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
133.91k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
50.47k (x2.43)
TOTAL
1162.63k
752.57k (x0.65)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
2925 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
2486 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
1275 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
481 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
7167 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
7700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
7186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
5603 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
2885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
5665 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
21338 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4