Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 2.3 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 2.3 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
870f10
Core
Broadwell-EP
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/28
8/16
TDP
120 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
March 2016
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
17.57k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
27.38k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
9.35k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
23.9k (x9.32)
TOTAL
41.35k
78.2k (x1.89)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
176.08k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
219.88k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
100k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
12.93k (x0.62)
TOTAL
1162.63k
508.89k (x0.44)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4