Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i9-12900KF
Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 1 times faster than the E5-2680 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 1 times faster than the E5-2680 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
90672
Core
Broadwell-EP
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/28
16/24
TDP
120 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
30720 kB
Date
March 2016
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
1219.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
57.05k (x3.21)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
29.66k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
16.48k (x3.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
17.78k (x6.94)
TOTAL
41.35k
120.97k (x2.93)
Multithread
E5-2680 v4
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
546.04k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
437.01k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
211.36k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
24.92k (x1.2)
TOTAL
1162.63k
1219.33k (x1.05)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
9755 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4