Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core m3-7Y30
Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 8.1 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 8.1 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
806e9
Core
Haswell-EP
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
120 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
10.02k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
9.22k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
2.04k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
4.31k (x1.33)
TOTAL
36.31k
25.6k (x0.7)
Multithread
E5-2680 v3
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
21.75k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
20.51k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
4.97k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
5.56k (x0.45)
TOTAL
426.58k
52.78k (x0.12)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4