| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core i9-9900K


Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
906ed
Core
Haswell-EP
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
120 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
529.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
32.08k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
28.17k (x2.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
6.68k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
14.98k (x4.62)
TOTAL
36.31k
81.91k (x2.26)

Multithread

E5-2680 v3

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
242.98k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
220.16k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
53.97k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
12.22k (x0.98)
TOTAL
426.58k
529.32k (x1.24)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
5572 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4