Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core i7-10870H
Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a0652
Core
Haswell-EP
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
487.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
30.38k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
27.95k (x2.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
6.51k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
14.37k (x4.43)
TOTAL
36.31k
79.2k (x2.18)
Multithread
E5-2680 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
216.18k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
210.82k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
51.57k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
8.47k (x0.68)
TOTAL
426.58k
487.05k (x1.14)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4