Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core i5-7200U
Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 4.4 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 4.4 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
806e9
Core
Haswell-EP
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2014
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
97.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
19.34k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
17.47k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
4.08k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
4.04k (x1.25)
TOTAL
36.31k
44.94k (x1.24)
Multithread
E5-2680 v3
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
42.86k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
41.3k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
9.69k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
3.68k (x0.3)
TOTAL
426.58k
97.52k (x0.23)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
6501 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4