| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core i3-8130U


Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 4.8 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
806ea
Core
Haswell-EP
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
88.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
21.09k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
19.41k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
4.05k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
2.8k (x0.86)
TOTAL
36.31k
47.35k (x1.3)

Multithread

E5-2680 v3

i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
38.23k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
38.89k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
8.75k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
2.47k (x0.2)
TOTAL
426.58k
88.35k (x0.21)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
5890 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4