Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Ryzen 7 4700U
Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 4700U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the 4700U gets 269.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.6 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the 4700U gets 269.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.6 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
860f01
Core
Haswell-EP
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/8
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
49.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
269.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
10.38k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
22.63k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
8.52k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
7.99k (x2.46)
TOTAL
36.31k
49.53k (x1.36)
Multithread
E5-2680 v3
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
86.74k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
128.69k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
48.71k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
5.41k (x0.44)
TOTAL
426.58k
269.56k (x0.63)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
5783 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
8579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
3248 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
17970 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
2533 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5520 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
2078 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
1949 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
12080 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4