Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
a50f00
Core
Haswell-EP
Barcelo
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
18.57k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
22.03k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
9.55k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
20.5k (x6.32)
TOTAL
36.31k
70.65k (x1.95)
Multithread
E5-2680 v3
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
92.92k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
128.4k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
54.82k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
5.13k (x0.41)
TOTAL
426.58k
281.26k (x0.66)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4