Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 5.5 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 5.5 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f81
Core
Haswell-EP
Dali
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
12/24
2/4
TDP
120 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
9.33k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
17.1k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
3.57k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
3.26k (x1.01)
TOTAL
36.31k
33.26k (x0.92)
Multithread
E5-2680 v3
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
22.14k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
40.04k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
10.71k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
5k (x0.4)
TOTAL
426.58k
77.88k (x0.18)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4