Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Ryzen 3 1200
Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 3.6 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 3.6 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
800f11
Core
Haswell-EP
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
AM4
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/4
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2014
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
117.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
11.73k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
18.85k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
4.22k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
2.76k (x0.85)
TOTAL
36.31k
37.55k (x1.03)
Multithread
E5-2680 v3
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
38.56k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
62.21k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
13.7k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
3.33k (x0.27)
TOTAL
426.58k
117.81k (x0.28)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
1812 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4