Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core i5-13400
Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
b06f2
Core
Haswell-EP
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
10/16
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
497.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
47.01k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
26.73k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
14.28k (x3.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
12.1k (x3.73)
TOTAL
36.31k
100.11k (x2.76)
Multithread
E5-2680 v3
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
228.2k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
160.28k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
71.12k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
38.23k (x3.08)
TOTAL
426.58k
497.83k (x1.17)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
7659 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4