| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core i3-13100F


Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
b06f5
Core
Haswell-EP
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
4/8
TDP
120 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
47.14k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
25.77k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
13.25k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
14.77k (x4.56)
TOTAL
36.31k
100.94k (x2.78)

Multithread

E5-2680 v3

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
168.51k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
142.8k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
63.57k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
15.34k (x1.24)
TOTAL
426.58k
390.23k (x0.91)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4