Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
90672
Core
Haswell-EP
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
12/24
6/12
TDP
120 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
37.79k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
24.07k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
12.44k (x3.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
13.71k (x4.23)
TOTAL
36.31k
88.01k (x2.42)
Multithread
E5-2680 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
212.6k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
197.81k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
84.35k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
17.48k (x1.41)
TOTAL
426.58k
512.23k (x1.2)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4