Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Core i9-11900H
Description
The E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v3 gets a score of 426.6 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
806d1
Core
Haswell-EP
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
120 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2014
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
36.31k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.58k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v3
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.86k
33.38k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
10.06k
27.12k (x2.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
11.69k (x2.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.24k
17k (x5.24)
TOTAL
36.31k
89.19k (x2.46)
Multithread
E5-2680 v3
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
218.93k
249.83k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
139.75k
237.26k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55.47k
84.18k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.42k
13.2k (x1.06)
TOTAL
426.58k
584.47k (x1.37)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v3
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
1824 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1165 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
462 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
3555 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v3
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
5716 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3049 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
983 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
11002 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4