Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Pentium 4415U
Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 537 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 9.5 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 537 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 9.5 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2/4
TDP
115 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
2048 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
56.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
8.29k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
11.82k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
3.09k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.18k (x0.97)
TOTAL
31.6k
27.39k (x0.87)
Multithread
E5-2680 v2
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
17.24k (x0.08)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
27.4k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
7.44k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
4.31k (x0.38)
TOTAL
536.99k
56.39k (x0.11)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1898 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1799 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
873 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
4669 points/W
3759 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3323 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2982 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1197 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
8777 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4