| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i5-7300U


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i5-7300U gets 84.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 6.5 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2/4
TDP
115 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
109.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
9.96k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
15.11k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
3.87k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.54k (x1.05)
TOTAL
31.6k
33.47k (x1.06)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
25.26k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
40.6k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
11.24k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
5.83k (x0.51)
TOTAL
536.99k
82.94k (x0.15)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
9.85k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
17.37k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.98k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
5.11k (x1.4)
TOTAL
28.23k
36.31k (x1.29)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
25.37k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
43.43k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
10.62k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
5.4k (x0.62)
TOTAL
551.1k
84.82k (x0.15)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
2896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
708 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
5655 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
4962 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
1137 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
10376 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4