Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i5-3320M
Description
Both models E5-2680 v2 and i5-3320M are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 9.4 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 9.4 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2/4
TDP
115 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2013
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
58.81k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
10.89k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
9.77k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
3.98k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
3.77k (x0.87)
TOTAL
31.6k
28.4k (x0.9)
Multithread
E5-2680 v2
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
20.23k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
20.83k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
9.49k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
4.04k (x0.35)
TOTAL
536.99k
54.6k (x0.1)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
10.64k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
10.53k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
4.07k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
3.97k (x1.08)
TOTAL
28.23k
29.22k (x1.03)
Multithread
E5-2680 v2
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
21.27k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
23.93k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
9.48k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
4.12k (x0.47)
TOTAL
551.1k
58.81k (x0.11)
Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
608 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
684 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
1680 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
3225 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
3191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
1234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
8853 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4