| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i3-4170


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-4170 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i3-4170 gets 72.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 7.6 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
306c3
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
10 /20
2/4
TDP
115 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2013
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
44.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
92.71k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
13.1k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
11.68k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
5.07k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.19k (x0.97)
TOTAL
31.6k
34.04k (x1.08)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
25.81k (x0.12)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
25k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
11.96k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
3.87k (x0.34)
TOTAL
536.99k
66.65k (x0.12)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
13.24k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
12.37k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
5.11k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
4.17k (x1.14)
TOTAL
28.23k
34.89k (x1.24)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
28.15k (x0.13)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
29.95k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
11.84k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
2.73k (x0.31)
TOTAL
551.1k
72.68k (x0.13)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
521 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
555 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
219 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
1346 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
3579 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
1381 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
1126 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
9430 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4