| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v2 vs Core i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v2 gets a score of 551.1 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 512.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306e4
806d0
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
10 /20
8/16
TDP
115 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
25600 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2013
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
28.23k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
551.1k points
709.85k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
11.96k
15.22k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
10.73k
25.2k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
12.66k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
11.66k (x2.71)
TOTAL
31.6k
64.74k (x2.05)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
218.24k
155.37k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
206.92k
260.27k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100.37k
115.37k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.45k
20.04k (x1.75)
TOTAL
536.99k
551.04k (x1.03)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-2680 v2
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
10.55k
17.25k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
10.02k
25.53k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
12.56k (x3.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.66k
11.4k (x3.12)
TOTAL
28.23k
66.74k (x2.36)

Multithread

E5-2680 v2

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
215.04k
144.5k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
230.43k
243.41k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.87k
109.02k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.76k
16k (x1.83)
TOTAL
551.1k
512.94k (x0.93)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v2
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
1870 points/W
3211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2004 points/W
5409 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
2423 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
356 points/W
TOTAL
4792 points/W
11399 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v2
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
2931 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2784 points/GHz
5550 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1109 points/GHz
2731 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1017 points/GHz
2479 points/GHz
TOTAL
7841 points/GHz
14509 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4